Chargeability area

Philippines Visa Bulletin Forecasts

Final Action Date predictions issued Oct 23, 2026 using published data through the November 2026 Visa Bulletin.

Category Latest publishedNov 2026 bulletin Next bulletinDec 2026 12 monthsNov 2027
EB-1
Latest published Current
Next bulletin
Current
Range Jan 2026 – Current
12 months
Current
Range Feb 2027 – Current
EB-2
Latest published Apr 2025
Next bulletin
Apr 2025
Range Apr 2025
12 months
Mar 2026
Range Oct 2025 – Mar 2027
EB-3
Latest published Aug 15, 2023
Next bulletin
Aug 2023
Range Aug 2023 – Dec 2023
12 months
Aug 2024
Range Nov 2023 – Dec 2024

Philippines Final Action Dates

Forecast issued Oct 23, 2026 · published cutoffs through Nov 2026 · predictions for EB-1, EB-2, and EB-3

The Forecast rail starts at the first predicted month. Solid lines are published visa bulletins, dashed lines are predictions, and category-colored bands show their pessimistic - optimistic range. A triangular U linked to a prediction means its range includes an Unavailable outcome. Older runs overlay predictions with outcomes that arrived later.

Chargeability area

Methodology

Forecasts use a deterministic supply-demand model (the cause) rather than extrapolating historical cutoff dates (the symptom). For each EB category and chargeability, the model constructs cumulative visa number demand by priority date month from USCIS pending I-485 inventory, DOS consular issuances and annual Table V usage, recent I-140 approvals, and approved-petition counts beyond the current DOF. The model then simulates the modeled demand against the knowledge-available annual visa limit, taking into account category allocations, per-country ceilings, spillover rules, and monthly pacing. It then applies deterministic rules to approximate VO decisions to advance, hold, or retrogress dates based on demand.

Identifiable parameters are recalculated from published usage and approval ratios; otherwise, defaults and bounds are calibrated from historical sweep, hold, and retrogression episodes and evaluated by backtesting (holding out all data "published in the future"). The displayed pessimistic–optimistic range is a scenario band, not a statistical confidence interval: it combines higher demand, lower supply, and more conservative cutoff control at one bound, and the reverse assumptions at the other. The model combines category-level petition-to-demand factors with inflow and route estimates by category and chargeability, plus separate attrition and cross-chargeability assumptions. It does not resolve duplicate petitions, derivatives, or category changes person by person. EB-4/EB-5 vertical spillover is assumed to be negligible in recent FYs. We also do not model time-varying discretionary behavior by VO, such as unusually aggressive or restrained advances intended to elicit demand; thus policy, processing, or filing-behavior shifts may move actual dates outside the band and are not possible to be modeled here.

How accurate has it been?

Rolling historical tests compare forecasts with outcomes the model had not yet seen.

Date error measures the average distance between predicted and published Final Action Dates when both are dated.